Magistrate,
plus
in
his pay
a
a camera similar allowance of $1200. (see last sentence of 3598/00.1)
It follows therefore that Mr Wood's appt. & pay while holding the post of Registrar, Land Court has already been reported & acquiesced in,
but we should ask as to his being allowed to draw triple pay for 3 months in 1902 while he was acting as well Police Magistrate • a bag over the lag, ahht betting Registrar, aby over that no doubt accidentally omitted in the encls to 242722.3
Similarly the tempy. appts. of Messrs. Wolfe & Ross as additional Registrar are satisfactory explained in par 5 of 9527, they were allowed to draw the full pay of passed cadet plus the full allnce. and practically sanctioned dest, on 2153/00, & it was not $1200, was by LAVA whire half the pay of passed cades pins half the pay of the appt. wd have been sufficient pay, it was not rally w aver.... since acting but a tempy appt., I the two half pays wd. have given the officer $9058.20 less than we sanctioned on 21513/00.
Similarly I think that the allice aLo secretary of the Board, wh. was to Mr Ross. Aquatters Board., plus his full pay. aud only $1200 passed cadet, though in form irregular, was Justifiable Dor the analogy of 21513/00.
The last case on the list where as sanctioned in Mr Kemp drew $200 instead of $100 a month. 3598/00-1 as acting Police Magistrate, a new ava because in the interval we sanctioned the creation of a appt. of Second Police Magistrate with full pay of $4,800 a yl, and the fact that he drew also full pay impassed cadet was in accordance th the rule then in force (see 50455/02) wh. we have since amended to ask you. ? simply Therefore at A above, & observe as ao to Mr Wolf's prativity of $200 as in last par of ca celled i raft hereon, Texplain 5a.o. C.P.£.26 26,5 SW
()-81215 — 1000-6-1900
7
19720- 3000-2-01
93
Magistrate,
plus
in
his pay
а
camer
a similar allnce. of $1200. (see last sentence of 3598/00.1)
It follows the refore that Mr Wood's appt. & pay while holding the host of Registrar, Land Court has already
acquiesced in,
been reported &
but
we shd ask as to his being allowed to triple pay for 3 months in 202
draw
while he was
evo
as well
Police Magistrate
• abag over the lag, ahht betting Registrar, aby over that
no doubt accidentally omitted in
the encls to 2.42722.3
Similarly the tempy, appts. of
Messrs. Wolfe &
Ross
ao
additional
Registrar are satisfactors by explained
in par 5 of 9527,
they
the fact that
were allowed to draw the full bay of passed cadet plus the full allnce.
and practically sanctioned dest, on 215 3/00, & it was not
A $1200, was
by
LAVA
whire half the pay of passed
cades pins half the pay of the appt.
wd have been sufficient pay,
it was not rally
w
aver....
since
()-81215 — 1000-6-1900
acting but a tempy appt., I the two half pays
7
19720- 3000-2-01
wd. have given the
officer $9058 20
less than we
93
sanctioned on 21513
Similarly I think that the allice
aLo
secretary of the Board, wh. was
to Mr Ross. Aquatters Board., plus his full pay.
aud
only
$1200
passed cadet,
though in form erregular,
Justifiable
Dor
was
the analogy of 21513/00.
The last case on
the list where
as sanctioned in
Mr Kemp drew $200 instead of $100 a month. 3598/00-1
as acting Police Magistrate,
a new
ava
because in the interval we sanctioned the creation of a appt. of Second Police Magistrate with full pay of $4,800 a yl, and the
fact that he drew also full pay impassed cadet was in accordance th the rule then in force (see 50455/02) wh. we have since amended to
ask you. ? simply Therefore
at A above, & observe as
ao
to Mr Wolf's
prativity of $200 as in last par of ca celled i raft hereon, Texplain 5a.o. C.P.£.26 26,5
SW
-
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.